Possibly. I took what I recall were "N times faster than the original Pi" and "N times faster than the latest model" announcements."rounding down error" - is it because the Pi2B (2014) is missing?
I didn't recall the 3A+/3B+ being said to be 12 times faster than originals. But maybe I was wrong, and that's where my error is -
Pi 5 - "2-3x Pi 4B" - https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-5 - About 2.5 which everyone seems to agree on.
Pi 4B - "2-4x Pi 3B+" - https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/raspbe ... ow-from-35 - So I may have even been over generous there.
Pi 3B - "1.5-1.6 x Pi 2B, 10x Pi1" - https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/raspberry-pi-3-on-sale - That seems to be the error. And that gets us closer -
Code:
x 1 x 13 x 52 x 130 .-----------. .---------. .----. .----. | A/B/A+/B+ |-> x 13 ->| 3A+/3B+ |-> x 4 ->| 4B |-> x 2.5 ->| 5B | `-----------' `---------' `----' `----'And I am not convinced the ten fold increase was ever borne out in practice. Hnece my original 4 for 3B and 4.5 for 3B+.
There are some official Raspberry Pi benchmarks here - https://magpi.raspberrypi.com/articles/ ... benchmarks
I expect someone has got benchmarks for the whole caboodle.
Statistics: Posted by hippy — Mon Aug 19, 2024 4:36 pm