Give it a try, but I guess the compiler will say 'no'.
I would propose to use a third variable enum State as an indicator what the data are (not tested):
Then in your code you do not check for a specific value of wav, but can use the enum and exactly know what the data are.
I would propose to use a third variable enum State as an indicator what the data are (not tested):
Code:
enum State { SILENCE, NOSILENCE};struct Wav{ unsigned char* wav ; // perhaps you want to use uint8_t instead unsigned int wav_len;// perhaps you want to use uint32_t or size_t instead enum State state;} audio_wav;If (flag=0){ audio_wav.wav = sil11k_s8_wav; audio_wav.wav_len = sil11k_s8_wav_len ; audio_wav.state = State::SILENCE;} else { audio_wav.wav = nullptr; audio_wav.wav_len = 0;; audio_wav.state = State::NOSILENCE;}Statistics: Posted by ghp — Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:44 pm
